Research Article

Assessing postgraduates’ acceptance and usage of a learning management system

Kamaludeen Samaila 1 * , Sufiyanu Dauda 2 , Abdulhamid Mustapha 3
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Aliero, Kebbi State, NIGERIA2 Public-Private Partnership Unit, Federal Ministry of Works, Mabushi, FCT- Abuja, NIGERIA3 Federal Science College, Sokoto Federal Ministry of Education, Sokoto State, NIGERIA* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 7(1), January 2025, e2503, https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/15692
Submitted: 18 June 2024, Published Online: 05 December 2024, Published: 01 January 2025
OPEN ACCESS   106 Views   40 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The study examines the acceptance and the usage of a new learning management system (LMS) among postgraduates of a public university in Malaysia. A quantitative method was employed in which a questionnaire was used to collect the data. Two hundred and ninety-seven samples of students were randomly selected from nine hundred and twenty-one students. A statistical package for social science version 22 and descriptive statistics were used to determine the acceptance and extent to which students are intended to use the LMS. The descriptive statistics revealed that students are willing to use the new LMS in their educational activities. They were able to download and access the lecture notes through the LMS as well as upload and submit their assignments using LMS. In addition, the findings revealed that students enjoyed using LMS and it fitted their learning styles. However, students believed that if the university’s internet connection could be upgraded, students could have had a more enjoyable experience in using the new LMS. The findings might be useful for LMS managers, faculty members, and university management, to understand the level at which students accept and utilize the new LMS. This would also help the university authority to upgrade and improve the compatibility of the system and develop appropriate policies and strategies to encourage long-term usage of the LMS. Having limited and few studies of a newly implemented LMS, this study could identify not only the extent to which students are accepted and use the new LMS but also reveal that students’ perception of performance expectancy is critical for acceptance and usage the new LMS.

CITATION (APA)

Samaila, K., Dauda, S., & Mustapha, A. (2025). Assessing postgraduates’ acceptance and usage of a learning management system. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 7(1), e2503. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/15692

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmad, N. A. B., Elias, N. F., Ashaari, N. S., & Mohamed, H. (2023). Learning management system acceptance factors for technical and vocational education training (TVET) institutions. TEM Journal, 12(2), 1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122-61
  2. Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2010). Instructors’ acceptance of learning management systems: A theoretical framework. Communications of the IBIMA, 2010, Article 862128. https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.862128
  3. Alias, N. A., & Zainuddin, A. M. (2005). Innovation for better teaching and learning: Adopting the learning management system. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 27–40.
  4. AL-Nuaimi, M. N., Al Sawafi, O. S., Malik, S. I., & Al-Maroof, R. S. (2024). Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to investigate determinants of acceptance and adoption of learning management systems in the post-pandemic era: A structural equation modeling approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 1710–1736.
  5. Amin, M. K., Akter, A., & Azhar, A. (2016). Factors affecting private university students’ intention to adopt e-learning system in Bangladesh. DIU Journal of Business and Economics, 10(2), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.36481/diujbe.v010i2.3m995m87
  6. Asamoah, M. K., Oheneba-Sakyi, Y., & Tagoe, M. (2024). Faculty acceptance of the utilization of learning management systems in teaching. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(4), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156168
  7. Bates, A. W., & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Bello, S. B., Samaila, K., Bashar, A., & Sani, M. A. (2023). An empirical investigation of computer literacy among students of College of Health Sciences and Technology in Kebbi State. Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Computational Mathematics, 4(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.15864/jmscm.4305
  9. Bhalalusesa, R., Lukwaro, E. E. A., & Clemence, M. (2013). Challenges of using e-learning management systems faced by the academic staff in distance based institutions from developing countries: A case study of the Open University of Tanzania. Huria: Journal of Open University of Tanzania, 14(1), 89–110.
  10. Das, S., & Datta, B. (2024). Application of UTAUT2 on adopting artificial intelligence powered lead management system (AI-LMS) in passenger car sales. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, Article 123241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123241
  11. Dauda, S., & Samaila, K. (2019). In-depth and systematic study of level of knowledge, skills and utilization of information and communication technologies (ICTS) among secondary school physics teachers. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research, 4(1), 27–31.
  12. Esawe, A. T., Esawe, K. T., & Esawe, N. T. (2023). Acceptance of the learning management system in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An application and extension of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20(2), 162–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107788
  13. Hsu, H.-H. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle: An empirical study based on UTAUT. Creative Education, 3, 44–46. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38B010
  14. Ifinedo, P. (2006). Acceptance and continuance intention of web-based learning technologies (WLT) use among university students in a Baltic country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00151.x
  15. Masood, M., Samaila, K., & Chau, K. T. (2022). Application of SQQ-based flipped classroom model on students’ achievement and engagement in ICT course. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 6(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/11527
  16. Muruthy, A. E., & Yamin, F. M. (2017). The perception and effectiveness of learning management system (LMS) usage among the higher education students. Journal of Technology and Operations Managemen, 12(1), 86–98.
  17. Raman, A., & Don, Y. (2013). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies, 6(7), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n7p157
  18. Ross, S. M. (2019). Slack it to me: Complementing LMS with student-centric communications for the millennial/post-millennial student. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475319833113
  19. Samaila, K., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2024). Reinventing teaching pedagogy: The benefits of quiz-enhanced flipped classroom model on students’ learning outcomes and engagement. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 1214–1227. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2023-0173
  20. Samaila, K., Abdulfattah, K., & Amir, A. F. I. (2017). Learning management system usage with postgraduate school: An application of UTAUT model. International Journal of Education and Evaluation, 3(12), 38–49.
  21. Samaila, K., Khambari, M. N. M., Kumar, J. A., & Masood, M. (2022). Factors influencing postgraduate students’ intention to use learning management system. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 9(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2177
  22. Samaila, K., Libata, I. A., Aliyu, S. D., & Dauda, S. (2018). Availability and utilization of e-learning resources among lecturers of Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Aliero. Journal of Technology and Education in Nigeria, 23(1), 110.
  23. Samaila, K., Masood, M., & Chau, K. T. (2021a). Enhancing student’s engagement and ICT skills through modified flipped classroom model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education (pp. 78–87).
  24. Samaila, K., Masood, M., & Chau, K. T. (2021b). Using flipped classroom model: Factors influencing students’ satisfaction. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(2), Article e02112. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11260
  25. Samaila, K., Tsong, C. K., Masood, M., & Bervell, B. (2024). Think-pair-share based flipped classroom: A model for improving students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(1), Article ep2410. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14422
  26. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  27. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428